Allow me to explain that complex thought. I didn't say that all machines are useless, nor did I say that any machine is useless. One machine that is useful for Purpose #1 is useless for Purpose #2; likewise, the machine that works well for Purpose #2 is quite possibly useless for Purpose #1.
There may be a good replacement for a machine that can do Purpose #1, but not one that can work for both #1 and #2. What I was trying to say was that the term "desktop" in this context is a very broad term; one person's idea of a desktop replacement is going to be very different to another person's idea of a desktop replacement. On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 09:46:00 +0300 li...@wrant.com wrote: > Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:07:24 +1000 <bytevolc...@safe-mail.net> > > On the other hand, those types of machines are useless for high-end > > video editing, which may be what a "desktop" is to you. > > That's one very complex thought, hold it, keep still, don't move an > inch. No machine is useless, it's the operator that makes use of it, > go figure.
