Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi Theo!
Gesendet: Montag, 08. August 2016 um 17:21 Uhr
Von: "Theo Buehler" <t...@math.ethz.ch>
An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: thunderbird segfaults
disklayout:
a: 5122.2M /
b: 1019.8M swap
d: 10244.6M /tmp
e: 15359.0M /var
f: 30718.0M /usr
g: 914285.1M /home
/usr is mounted read-only
/var is mounted no-exec
So much space and no separate /usr/local ? why?
Lazyness :-) and not being a developer I find it suitable for my needs
(flexibility with growing needs under /usr ): If _really_ necessary (about once
in 2 years) I simply install everything fresh but /home.
That's some kind of "laziness" there; you have to spend extra effort to
get the installer to partition your drive like that, since it adds both
/usr and /usr/local by default. ;)
Also, there's almost 30GB allocated to it. You could have allocated 10GB
to /usr and the rest to /usr/local and you'd be good enough to install a
few dozen packages at least.
If this is really the case, please make sure /usr is mounted wxallowed,
see https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade60.html
Yes - it is mounted wxallowed (Janne@ was the very first today to ask this).
On that note, is there a list of ports/packages that needs wxallowed (or
any way to obtain such a list)? It would be rather a shame if you only
had packages that don't need wxallowed (eg. gateway, server) and that
wxallowed option is sitting on the file system.
