Understood (though in this case it looks unfinished when 99% of the implementation is already present).
In any case you have answered my original question. Thanks, Ted. On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:29:25 -0400 "Ted Unangst" <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote: > bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > I'm not saying "you must do everything my way or else", but rather I > > am trying to understand the reasoning behind making this hardcoded > > and fixed, as opposed to being admin-settable; maybe something is > > planned here I am unaware of? > > We're trying to keep the options to a minimum, which keeps the > implementation simple, but more importantly keeps the documentation > short and reduces the number of decisions that need to be made.
