My suggestion to resolve the whole issue: forward mail through your ISP's mailserver or go and buy a cheap VPS.
Amazon EC2 micro instances work fine for the purpose, and it is possible with some hackery to install OpenBSD on them. --- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias <w...@roquesor.com> wrote: > In article <20170808121343.46a8ddb9@fir.internal> you wrote: > > Hi Walter: > > > > On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:45:22 +0200 Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > > > What determines those "ranges", who regulates that? > > > > Some ISPs submit IP blocks to various blacklists. e.g: > > https://www.Spamhaus.Org/faq/section/Spamhaus%20PBL#242 > > http://www.Sorbs.Net/faq/dul.shtml > > > > Asking your ISP to exclude your addresses might help. > > > I sent an email to my ISP, they don't even know about this lists. :-) > > Besides, I sent an email to spamhaus.org suggesting them not to include > static IPs in their PBL list by default as they do. > > > I'll take this chance to share my thinking with everyone here. > > I understand that given everyone uses gmail, hotmail or mail provided by > some multinational hosting service they assume mail coming from > residential connections cannot be other thing but spam sent from hacked > machines. But someone paying for a static IP in a residential > connection is the opposite case. When you have to deal with thousands > of users you resort to any trick you find on the Internet and start to > blindly blacklist all; this is a big servers problem. And the more > users you have to deal with the worse. On the contrary, from my part, I > have just a pair of personal addresses, so it's not a big deal for me to > audit my server and use more sane, less harmful and, overall, more > effective measures to filter spam and to prevent spam be sent from my > machine. And I think this is the direction everyone should point to > instead of resting day after day more and more on big companies for > everything. In general, everyone should tend to decentralize instead of > monopolize. The real problem is the passive attitude most people assume > in the use of the Internet (and life in general but I don't want to bore > you with cheap philosophy. :-)) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Thank you for your advice. > >
