On 03/30/18 13:32, 3 wrote: > people like you do not understand what better badly does work than > well not works. and it is not our(not ordinary users) fault that the
Seriously, cipher, you're just spewing word salad again. And it sounds vaguely like abuse, aimed at people who were in fact offering useful suggestions. Some of us were able to decipher what we thought was your problem (wanting to record dropped packets) and offered suggestions on how to do that along with the explanation why your original approach was never going to work. If you really want to record your dropped packets in a netflow format, there's nothing stopping you from implementing just that. Whether your implementation will be accepted back the OpenBSD source tree is of course a different and separate question. One thing is certain, though: Spewing abuse-ish word salad at mailing lists is not going to get you anywhere. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
