> On 03/30/18 13:32, 3 wrote: >> people like you do not understand what better badly does work than >> well not works. and it is not our(not ordinary users) fault that the
> Seriously, cipher, you're just spewing word salad again. > And it sounds vaguely like abuse, aimed at people who were in fact > offering useful suggestions. to give useful suggestions first need to understand the question. perhaps my poor english prevented you from understanding the question > Some of us were able to decipher what we thought was your problem > (wanting to record dropped packets) and offered suggestions on how to do > that along with the explanation why your original approach was never > going to work. my initial approach does work. u are have comments about route-to? > If you really want to record your dropped packets in a netflow format, > there's nothing stopping you from implementing just that. in next time remind yourself that you can surgery on your own, instead of going to a surgeon > Whether your implementation will be accepted back the OpenBSD source > tree is of course a different and separate question. i am a ordinary user(not a surgeon) and have already talked about it, but my poor english.. > One thing is certain, though: Spewing abuse-ish word salad at mailing > lists is not going to get you anywhere. sorry about that -_- i should have left as soon as i understand we were living in different worlds
