On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:15:00PM +0300, Consus wrote: > On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias > > > > wrote: > > > > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-) > > > > > > > > > > The part I'm not clear is I read in current.html remote authenticated > > > > > users need a explicit rule. Do I need to add some "match auth" rule? > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes. > > > > > > > > before, "from local" would match authenticated users as if they had sent > > > > mail from the local machine but this led to being unable to express some > > > > setups where depending on the source you want to relay to different hubs > > > > even though users are authenticated. > > > > > > > > > > > > With this: > > > > > > > > > match from local for local apply local_users > > > > > match from any for domain <vdomains> virtual <valiases> apply > > > > > local_users > > > > > match from local sender <addresses> for any apply remote_users > > > > > > > > you need an additonal rule such as: > > > > > > > > match auth from any sender <addresses> for any apply remote_users > > > > > > > > > > > > because: > > > > > > > > > #accept from local sender <addresses> for any relay > > > > > > > > no longer matches authenticated users > > > > > > Ain't it "action local_users" instead of "apply local_users"? The man > > > page states "action". > > > > oopsie, yes, action, forget about apply, it doesn't exist, I should not > > answer mail while talking on the phone :-) > > Frankly, I like apply better :( >
no matter the keywords, there's no way 100% people would be satisfied :) be happy, first iteration was "match [...] => foobar", now 'action' does not look so bad hu ? -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
