On May 27, 2018 2:21:13 PM AKDT, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: >certbot used to just be called "letsencrypt" and was some kind of joint >EFF/letsencrypt development, hence the close relationship.
That's fine. If certbot may be used with other CAs, and if letsencrypt is willing to issue certs on request from other clients, and they are O.K. with that, so much the better. Otherwise we've got something a little bit too proprietary-ish going on, but in any case, letsencrypt is the default or example CA for OpenBSD's native acme-client. Plenty of folks are no doubt a bit concerned about the commercial viability of their business model of charging money for "commercial" certs accepted by major browsers. Maybe it's actually illegal to use a non-commercial cert on a .biz domain and I just haven't been made officially aware of that fact. -- https://www.colmena.biz/~justina/contacto.php
