* Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-03 13:16]:
> On 2006/02/03 20:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But I was hoping SpamD had some kind of understanding of SASL.
>
> I'm quite glad it *doesn't*. Port 587 (msa/submission) is the right
> answer here. I wouldn't want a daemon that's intended to talk to bad
> connections having such high access to the system...
>
This is the right solution for roaming users, and is why
I will *not* make spamd ever have a notion of sasl :)
It is also, exactly, what we do here. Our users use
port 587 for this, NOT port 25
-Bob
