> Answered it in the long, the short version is: Chrome/Iridium is safer code.
Chrome is also way more comfortable to develop y'all web/mobile apps in. Win-win! All the best, Murk On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > In that case, are the Chromium updates in current worth attempting to > > backport to stable? > > the team does not do significant backports like that. > > > Or are the stable builds safer than the backported Firefox builds > > throughout the six months or so that they remain frozen? > > Answered it in the long, the short version is: Chrome/Iridium is safer > code. > >
