On 2006/02/03 20:34, Josh Tolley wrote: > All that being said, we 1) didn't have an encryption accelerator > in the box
that would tend to make things worse anyway - you'll just increase the rate of interrupts and that seems to be the main problem.
On 2006/02/03 20:34, Josh Tolley wrote: > All that being said, we 1) didn't have an encryption accelerator > in the box
that would tend to make things worse anyway - you'll just increase the rate of interrupts and that seems to be the main problem.