On 28/08/2018 13:13, Dave Voutila wrote:
Any reason you can't use something like gunicorn as the app server and use relayd on the egress?
I haven't thought about it. We have existing stack with config files, admin scripts, friendly Makefiles, etc. It's a turn-key solution that gives me a running app hanging on fastcgi socket.
Simple architecture would be egress running relayd and then gunicorn
What would be the benefit of "gunicorn+relayd" vs "uwsgi+httpd/nginx"? There is admin know-how and automation around current stack, but I'm keen on re-evaluating it if there are other benefits elsewhere. Biggest win would be chroot-table app server, but I'm not sure if it's easily doable with Python at all. Doable with gunicorn? Best regards, Chris
