* Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> le [25-11-2018 15:30:20 +0100]:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:21:46PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> > * Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> le [21-11-2018 21:06:39 +0100]:
> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:38:43PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> > > > * Edgar Pettijohn <ed...@pettijohn-web.com> le [21-11-2018 11:32:43 
> > > > -0600]:
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Nov 21, 2018 8:22 AM, Thuban <thu...@yeuxdelibad.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > I can't figure how to make this "junk" argument to work as 
> > > > > > mentioned in The smtpd.conf manpages :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If the junk argument is provided, the message will be
> > > > > > moved to the Junk folder if it contains a positive X-Spam
> > > > > > header.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > spams detected by spamassassin have multiple X-Spam-* headers, but 
> > > > > > aren't placed
> > > > > > into Junk folder.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any advice ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > ?????? thuban
> > > > > >
> > > > > It looks for a header matching:
> > > > > 
> > > > > X-Spam: Yes
> > > > > 
> > > > > You may need to configure spamassassin to write it that way. I 
> > > > > believe that the default is different, but I can't check right now.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I tried to add this in spamassassin.conf [0] :
> > > > 
> > > >         add_header spam X-Spam
> > > > 
> > > > But if you read the link [0] closely, it can't work because 
> > > > spamassassin add
> > > > headers "X-Spam-someting", never "X-Spam" : 
> > > > 
> > > >         All headers begin with X-Spam- (so a header_name Foo will 
> > > > generate a header called X-Spam-Foo)
> > > > 
> > > > I guess the "junk" keyword in smtpd.conf was written to be handy, so I 
> > > > miss
> > > > something. Where ?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > You didn't miss anything, the maildir agent only supports X-Spam headers
> > > as of today so this will need a diff to support SpamAssassin if it can't
> > > generate a X-Spam header.
> > > 
> > 
> > Okay, thanks, I doubt since english is not my main language.
> > 
> > > SpamAssassin wasn't a target when I wrote that feature but it's just one
> > > diff away ;-)
> > > 
> > 
> > Just need to check "X-Spam-Flag: YES" or "X-Spam-Status: Yes,.*" then.
> > 
> > Just curious, what was the target of that 'junk' feature ? rspamd ? Another 
> > ?
> > 
> > Regards.
> > 
> 
> in -current, maildir junk now recognizes X-Spam-Flag: YES

Thank you, I'll give it a try.
For now, I  use dovecot + lmtp and sieve for this (a bit too much...)

Reply via email to