Hi, my /etc/hostname looks exactly like you proposed:
inet6 autoconf autoconfprivacy soii inet6 <my IP6> when i enter the default IPv6 gateway manually. I can ping stuff but don't get a reply. When I don't: "No route to host" PF is not the problem. Same results when loading pf rules that look like this: "pass log all" The ISO was uploaded by me. There is one thing that has me wondering. When looking at the output of tcpdump. In your example you told me that the host on the right site of a neighbor sol is always the router/gateway.. But when I look at the output of that i see two different addresses who are NOT fe80::1. These IPs both follow this schema "fe80:something". When I take a closer look and run tcpdump while pinging I see the following output: (With route to fe80::1%vio added and the normal hostname.vio0) 11:40:36.446539 fe80::<MY LL> > ff02::1:ff00:1: icmp6: neighbor sol: who has fe80::1 This line is being repeated over and over again. I left out all the other traffic that is not related to my /64. Hm... Any ideas ? I've got a feeling that somethings wrong with that fe80::1 address... Stephan On 8/18/19 1:33 AM, freda_bundc...@nym.hush.com wrote: >> From: list <list () md5collisions ! eu> >> I've restarted my VM over the official >> Webinterface but still... >> When trying to ping the gateway on fe80::1 I don't get any icmp >> echoreplies. >> What is the behavior of pf when disabled ? Is there some kind of >> default blocking rule that is still active ? > Have you tried /etc/hostname.vio0 with > inet6 autoconf autoconfprivacy soii > inet6 <your ip6 address here> > > instead of specifying a LL route? > > Just in case, you could try /etc/pf.conf with only > > pass log all > > instead of disabling pf. > > Is the installion of OpenBSD provider by your VPS, or do they let > you use a custom ISO? Maybe a trial installation using a differnt > VPS but a similar configuration would indicate it's a problem with > the VPS. > >
