Perl is my favorite language, too. Perl can be gnarly but I love it. I have
zero experience with Lua so I can’t judge it but I’d like Perl to stay in
Base.

On Tuesday, December 31, 2019, Daniel Boyd <danieljb...@icloud.com> wrote:

> As one of the few remaining people out there who considers perl to be
> their favorite language—starting to wonder if it’s just me and Larry Wall
> at this point—I’d like to say that perl should stay in base on its merits,
> all the perl-based system tools notwithstanding.
>
> I decided learn perl because of OpenBSD back in the day. I was a primarily
> a java programmer (to be clear: not out of any affinity for Java) and had
> decided to use OpenBSD as my workstation OS. I quickly discovered that the
> Java development tools I used (netbeans, eclipse, etc.) weren’t all that
> robust in OpenBSD (old builds, crashy). So, I figured, OpenBSD users must
> not be java programmers and I set out figuring out what language they did
> use... by looking to see which languages were in base.
>
> Fast forward like 15 years and I’m now a perl/vim guy (a far cry from
> java/NetBeans!) and I couldn’t be happier. While I tolerated java, I
> actually really like perl. And the more I learn of it, the better i like
> it. I think a lot of people just haven’t really taken the time to learn
> perl’s subtleties and true perlish coding conventions. It’s really
> wonderful once you know it well.
>
> Ok— rant over. Carry on.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 31, 2019, at 12:11 AM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Removing perl from base would be very painful.
> >>
> >> I don't fancy rewriting all the perl tools in something else
> (specifically,
> >> most of the ports and package infrastructure)
> >>
> >> lua would definitely NOT be appropriate for that. The only half valid
> >> candidate would be python.
> >>
> >> Contrary to what some people might think, the tools in question won't be
> >> easier to understand and manage if written in another language.
> >>
> >
> > Contrary to what you think, the original proposal didn't come out of
> > a process called thinking.
> >
>
>

Reply via email to