On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:29:01PM +0200, Francois Pussault wrote:
> I agree ; Using more than 10 partitions is rare  but in case of NFS or other 
> network shares of course.
> 16 is really enough in my point of view.
> 

I've got to disgree with this one. I'm doing porting work.
I yank out all of the directories except /usr/ports itself,
using mk.conf. I then also make another partition /usr/ports/mystuff

umount /usr/ports/mystuff
umount /usr/ports
newfs /usr/ports, etc.
remount /usr/ports, mkdir /usr/ports/mystuff, remount /usr/ports/mystuff
tar xzvf ports.tar.gz into /usr/ports
and I can continue on working, without having lost any work I'm still
examining.

Working with retail equipment at home for a normal desktop. 16 OK
Power often fails or hardware fails.

Working on a server. Power almost never fails, nor the hardware.

At home I run built-in HD, USB flash and USB HD. 16 is no problem with
three HD's. I can ro lots of stuff and I need to.

I'm not doing any porting at home, only on server hardware. Too tired of
reliability issues at home.

That's just what I(me)thinks. |-}

There be-is-are some very good, cheap, rugged and waterproof USB HD's out
there. Very portable(s).

Bye,
Chris


Reply via email to