On 2021-07-15, Otto Moerbeek <o...@drijf.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:28:06PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> The problem appears to be here: >> >> > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 >> > wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0: <TS8GCF133> >> > wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA48, 7647MB, 15662304 sectors >> > wd1(wdc2:0:0): using BIOS timings >> >> > a: 1060.6M 64 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 # / >> > b: 256.0M 2172128 swap >> > c: 7647.6M 0 unused >> > d: 3072.0M 2696416 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 # /usr >> > e: 2048.0M 8987872 4.2BSD 2048 16384 1 # /home >> >> Your swap is only 256MB. That seem too low. (We have walked away from >> making it correspond to physical memory, but still, it seems uncomfortably >> low). >> >> As well, /usr seems a bit large, leaving not much for /home. >> >> The autoallocation scheme might have made a less than perfect decision here. >> > > Thhis is bassed on the "medium" allocation, swap, /usr and /home have > reached there max according to the table. We can make swap have a > alrager max and take more of the pie. What would be a good max size > for swap these days omn such a small disk? > > -Otto > >
It depends on the RAM really, normally that space is better in /usr so that upgrades don't break quite as easily...
