>> OK, with expectations adjusted,
>> does anyone know what the three numbers
>> are _supposed_ to be?
>>
I guess you are talking about those numbers:
> dev/ic/lm78var.h talks about Temperature 1, 2, 3;

The 1,2,3 are the corresponding ports from the chip itself, there are
3 ports for temperature reading, numbered from 1 to 3, so the
programmer kept the numbering and duplicated it in the actual C code
variables names.

> > > but man lm(4) only says
> > >
> > > Temp uK Motherboard Temperature

The manual says this:
"The original LM78 hardware monitor ..."
That is _NOT_ your case, since your sensor is reported as:
> > > wbsio0 at isa0 port 0x2e/2: W83627HF rev 0x41
> > > lm1 at wbsio0 port 0x290/8: W83627HF
LM78=/=W83627HF.
It has been included in the lm driver, maybe to avoid another extra
work and code duplication for a new driver, something like CD_ROMs put
on scsi drivers or something like this.

> Yes.  Temperature readings from multiple places on the motherboard.
Not quite in this case, only the first is a temperature reading, the
rest are bogus since the pins are not connected (i.e. floating,
reading whatever EMI is throwing to them).

Again, what you read on your specific hardware is the CPU die
temperature as the first temperature reported, the remaining 2
readings on temperature are bogus, they have no real meaning since the
pins have no sensors connected on them. At least this is if you read
the ALIX schematics.

Reply via email to