Maybe look at Meshcentral as an alternative to Rustdesk. It allows proxying
over https OOTB.

On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 19:30, Kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> wrote:

>
>
> > 3 марта 2024 г., в 00:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling <j...@aenertia.net>
> написал(а):
> >
> > ssh can work in tap VPN mode (ssh -w) and will tunnel udp fine ; I'm not
> > sure what you are trying to achieve but perhaps ssh tunnels might be an
> > option for your use case. You are probably better off setting up
> something
> > like wireguard, but in a pinch if the target and host already have ssh.
> >
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VPN_over_SSH
> >
> No, ssh tunnels is no-go for me. Remote hosts are windows, and they are
> mostly “wild” hosts.
> >
> >
> >> On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 07:26, Kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> 2 марта 2024 г., в 21:05, Stuart Henderson <stu.li...@spacehopper.org>
> >> написал(а):
> >>>
> >>> On 2024-03-02, Kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> wrote:
> >>>> Hello misc! There is a good manual on OpenBSD faq about redirection
> and
> >> reflection, here it is:
> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#tcpproxy
> >>>>
> >>>> I’m using nginx as tcp and udp proxy, but maybe there is another
> >> software, more suitable for this task?
> >>>> I need to redirect and reflect near 15 tcp ports and couple of udp.
> >>>> I know I can do this with only pf, but I switched to nginx
> >> intentionally, because this amount of ports made my pf config hard
> readable.
> >>>
> >>> As far as TCP goes, haproxy is possibly a bit better suited. It
> >>> doesn't do UDP though (and unlikely to in a generic way, see
> >>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/62).
> >>>
> >>> Depending on which UDP protocols are used there might be better
> >>> alternatives though - for example if it's DNS then look at dnsdist.
> >>> UDP proxying in most cases needs to be protocol-aware.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I’m afraid this is not dns, this is Rustdesk software and antivirus
> agent,
> >> and something else like this.
> >> Thank you anyway, I see there is not much options for me
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to