On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:53:27PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote: > *) Mason > - not practical in chroot without half of CPAN, so what is the point? > > I am leaning towards Mason behind a reverse Squid proxy
I would think that if you use mason with mod_perl[1] instead of running it as a CGI, you don't need anything (even perl) in the chroot. You do need to tell Apache to pre-load whatever modules you want to use when it starts, but I don't recall that being TOO difficult. It has been a while since I played with mod_perl but that is what I remember, I could be wrong. I do know that I am using perl modules from mod_perl that are not inside the chroot. [1] http://www.masonbook.com/book/chapter-7.mhtml l8rZ, -- andrew - ICQ# 253198 - JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BOFH excuse of the day: There isn't any problem
