On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:01:20AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 11:27:32AM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands little chance of making > > > anything better. Me, I just lurk here and do not speak for anyone, but > > > I can assure you that the OpenBSD folks are not so naive as to put any > > > trust in automated gizmos. > > > > Coverity found at least 30 bugs in OpenBSD (counting the number of > > commits to the cvs mailing list containing ``coverity'', according to > > marc), so it seems the OpenBSD developers *do* acknowledge the value > > of some automated testing. > > > > Also, tedu@ is a Coverity employee. > > Yes. *Relying* on such tools is foolish, as is not availing yourself of > the information they *do* provide.
Agreed, but Tony said ``the OpenBSD folks are not so naive as to put _any_ trust in automated gizmos,'' not ``[...] to _only_ put trust in [...].''
