On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Greg Thomas wrote: > On 9/20/06, Patsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, John Costello wrote: > > > > > This is in regards to a 3.9 system that I installed and am patching. > > > > > > After rebuilding the kernel (patches 007 and 009), is it , unnecessary, > > > necessary, advised, or imperative to rebuild userland (FAQ 5.3.5)? > > > Thanks, > > > > > Imperative. > > > > Your programs might work, but they might not, or they might work > > unpredictably. The kernel, userland (and ports for that matter) are all > > intended to be kept in sync, not half -stable and half -release, so if you > > have a -stable kernel, you should have a -stable userland as well. i.e. > > yes, rebuild your userland. > > > > Even if he is just patching, not using -stable? > > Greg I thought you did but after a brief search I can't find anything to suggest that you need to. Please ignore my last email.
Sorry for the noise. Patsy
