On Tuesday 17 October 2006 20:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it > >means. > > In case some peoples may NOT understood what I`m talking about: > DoS, Denial of Service. Mostly the word "DoS" is used for Software Bugs > even the Denial of Service can appear even by other stuff. > > Exmaple: You`re at meeting and somebody unplugs your pgt-Card and voila > your kernel crashs. I would call this a clearly DoS. Because after the > "attack" your OS is kinda useless because of the kernel panic. > > Well but you can always enjoy playing hangman in the ddb-Console so DoS > may not be the correct word at all..... ;]
Sebastian, you are confusing DoS with bug. What you describe is a bug. Yes, it "denies" you the use of your system but that isn't an attack. You're really splitting hairs here and aren't doing anything useful. --STeve Andre'
