On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:56:37AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > Hi Josh, > > On Tue, 05.12.2006 at 16:51:07 -0500, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. build a 4.0 RAIDFrame system locally, in a qemu or vmware virtual > > machine if necessary, on spare hardware if not. > > qemu could fill the bill if it supported the required target > architecture, but it doesn't. If I had spare hardware available, then I > had not asked. ;-} > > But thank you for the qemu idea anyway, I'll probably look further into > that direction.
Qemu for what? I missed the mail you are talking about. Remember that qemu does runtime rewriting of code and that performance can suck big time. It is excellent for testing and odd emulation tasks. But comparing qemu with vmware is not fair as it is not an apples to apples comparison. But then I might be digressing as I have absolutely no context here. Sorry if my mail is completely irrelevant. It perhaps is so. :) Best, Girish -- Linux is for folks who hate Windoze. FreeBSD is for folks who love UNIX. OpenBSD is for folks who can't live without UNIX.
