Hi,
I had setup a private test network with the following information to test
openbgp:
OBSD-01
-------
AS: 65213
IP: 10.0.111.77
OBSD-02
-------
AS: 65123
IP: 172.16.111.77
My /etc/bgpd.conf configuration for OBSD-01 and for OBSD-02:
# OBSD-01
AS 65213
router-id 10.0.111.77
network 10.0.111.0/24
neighbor 172.16.111.77 {
remote-as 65123
descr "link to OBSD-02"
}
# filter out prefixes longer than 24 or shorter than 8 bits
deny from any
allow from any prefixlen 8 - 24
# do not accept a default route
deny from any prefix 0.0.0.0/0
# filter bogus networks
deny from any prefix 10.0.0.0/8 prefixlen >= 8
deny from any prefix 172.16.0.0/12 prefixlen >= 12
deny from any prefix 192.168.0.0/16 prefixlen >= 16
deny from any prefix 169.254.0.0/16 prefixlen >= 16
deny from any prefix 192.0.2.0/24 prefixlen >= 24
deny from any prefix 224.0.0.0/4 prefixlen >= 4
# OBSD-02
AS 65123
router-id 172.16.111.77
network 172.16.111.0/24
neighbor 10.0.111.77 {
remote-as 65123
descr "link to OBSD-02"
}
# filter out prefixes longer than 24 or shorter than 8 bits
deny from any
allow from any prefixlen 8 - 24
# do not accept a default route
deny from any prefix 0.0.0.0/0
# filter bogus networks
deny from any prefix 10.0.0.0/8 prefixlen >= 8
deny from any prefix 172.16.0.0/12 prefixlen >= 12
deny from any prefix 192.168.0.0/16 prefixlen >= 16
deny from any prefix 169.254.0.0/16 prefixlen >= 16
deny from any prefix 192.0.2.0/24 prefixlen >= 24
deny from any prefix 224.0.0.0/4 prefixlen >= 4
Invoking "/usr/sbin/bgpctl" reload then doing "/usr/sbin/bgpctl -n show"
resulted in to the
following:
For /usr/sbin/bgpctl:
reload request sent.
request processed
For /usr/sbin/bgpctl show:
Neighbor AS MsgRcvd MsgSent OutQ Up/Down State/PrefixRcvd
172.16.111.77 65213 0 0 0 Never Active
10.0.111.77 65213 0 0 0 Never Active
My reference was the paper written by Claudio Jeker
(www.openbsd.org/papers/linuxtag06-network.pdf). I just replaced the IP address
with my setup but
as we can see in Up/Down as well as in State/PrefixRcvd in my result, it is in
contrast with the
result reflected in his paper.
Please advise if I did missed something down here.
Regards,
Demuel
