Hi,

I'm configuring 2 server to use as a gateway for multihoming.

I use:

OpenBSD 4.0 stable and OpenBSD 4.0 release
OpenBGPD
OpenOSPFD
CARP for failover

I have 2 router with 3 interfaces and 5 carp interfaces by router.

interface1 = eBGP with 2 upstream provider
interface2 = Link between the 2 routers, OSPF, iBGP (10.10.10.0/30)
(em0 and bge0)
interface3 = 5 * carp --> use as gateway for my servers (bge2)

Right now the BGP, and the CARP work correctly.

My problem is with the OSPF part.  OSPF by itself work correctly but
it didn't announce any route concerning the carp interface.

If I start ospfd with "ospfd -dv" I see many:
"if_fsm: event UP resulted in action START and changing state for
interface carpX from DOWN to DOWN"

-------------------

Router1:
ospfd.conf

router-id 0.0.0.1
redistribute 44.25.32.41/30

area 0.0.0.0 {
  auth-type crypt
  auth-md 1 "iii"
  auth-md 2 "jjj"
  auth-md-keyid 1

 interface em0 {
     metric 10
 }
 interface carp0 {
     passive
 }
 interface carp1
 interface carp2
 interface carp3
 interface carp4
}



hostname.bge2:
 inet 83.201.76.2 255.255.255.0 NONE description "My network"

-----------------

Router2:
ospfd.conf

router-id 0.0.0.2
redistribute 211.6.17.17/30

area 0.0.0.0 {
  auth-type crypt
  auth-md 1 "iii"
  auth-md 2 "jjj"
  auth-md-keyid 1

 interface bge0
 interface carp0 {
     passive
 }
 interface carp1
 interface carp2
 interface carp3
 interface carp4
}



hostname.bge2:
 inet 23.182.158.2 255.255.255.0 NONE description "My network"


---------------

Both router:

CARP:
hostname.carp0:
  inet 23.182.158.1 255.255.255.0 23.182.158.255 vhid 1 pass
temppass2 carpdev bge2

hostname.carp1:
   inet 83.201.77.1 255.255.255.0 83.201.77.255 vhid2 pass temppass2
carpdev bge2

hostname.carp2:
   inet 83.201.78.1 255.255.255.0 83.201.78.255 vhid3 pass temppass2
carpdev bge2

hostname.carp3:
   inet 83.201.79.1 255.255.255.0 83.201.79.255 vhid4 pass temppass2
carpdev bge2

hostname.carp4:
 inet 83.201.76.1 255.255.255.0 83.201.76.255 vhid5 pass temppass2 carpdev bge2



Thanks,
FranC'ois

Reply via email to