On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:55:19AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote: [..] > You may be right, but then I would have made the same error as he did > if I were in the same situation. Even though it is publicly accessible > does not mean to me that it was *published*
In some jurisdictions it just means that. > and there was certainly no insertion of a BSD license into the code used. > A CVS is a repository of code under development, not finished products. Not relevant in some jurisdictions. -- Exit! Stage Left!
