On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:34:57 -0400 Jeremy Huiskamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you'd bothered to inspect the headers you would have noticed that > the below message was sent before the one that has many replies but > it didn't arrive until about 20 hours after it was sent. Probably > stuck in the pipes somewhere, that seems to happen with misc@ alot. > Rico probably figured it was lost and so he sent another which is > fairly reasonable. Thank you Jeremy! That was exactly what happened :-) I thought my ISP had some problems with his SMTP server. > Jeremy > > On 10-Apr-07, at 12:44 PM, Bryan wrote: > > > Why post twice? Sending it as different person within 24 hours of one > > another is not going to get what you want... A couple of people gave > > you solutions, choose one, or move to Linux... > > > > Remember this??? > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > to misc@openbsd.org > > date Apr 9, 2007 4:43 PM > > subject Binary kernel and base update > > mailed-by openbsd.org > > > > Hi all. > > > > I have noticed that the OpenBSD team puts a lot of emphasis on > > using binary > > packets rather than building from ports, which I think IMHO is > > good, but why > > is it that there is no binary kernel updates, rather than patching > > the kernel > > from source? > > > > I am asking this not from a point that we find this difficult, > > rather in > > OpenBSD its really easy. But sometimes its very time consuming, and > > yes there > > exists binpatch and other solutions, but why isn't there an official > > OpenBSD way? > > > > Last week management decided to go back to using Debian on some of > > our servers > > due to them being easy to upgrade including kernel and basesystem > > upgrades. > > > > OpenBSD has really made a cool solution with pkg_add -u, but why > > not kernel > > and basesystem binary updates as well? > > > > Best and kind regards. > > > > Rico > > > > On 4/9/07, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all. > >> > >> I have noticed that the OpenBSD team puts a lot of emphasis on > >> using binary packets rather than building from ports, which I > >> think IMHO is good, but why is it that there is no binary kernel > >> updates, rather than patching the kernel from source? > >> > >> I am asking this not from a point that we find this difficult, > >> rather in OpenBSD its really easy. But sometimes its very time > >> consuming, and yes there exists binpatch and other solutions, but > >> why isn't there an official OpenBSD way? > >> > >> Last week management decided to go back to using Debian on some of > >> our servers due to them being easy to upgrade including kernel and > >> basesystem upgrades. > >> > >> OpenBSD has really made a cool solution with pkg_add -u, but why > >> not kernel and basesystem binary updates as well? > >> > >> Best and kind regards. > >> > >> Rico
