If you participate on this list, buy the cds. This isn't your flavor of the week linux distro.
On 5/2/07, Matiss Miglans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think there is checksums only for base system, without X, source, > ports, packages, etc.... > Or, I don't know where they find. > > Open Phugu wrote: > > On 5/2/07, Mike Erdely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:07:10PM -0400, Clint M. Sand wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:33:50PM -0700, andrew fresh wrote: > >> > > http://openbsd.somedomain.net/index.php?version=4.1 > >> > Just out of curiosity... > >> > > >> > Is it logical to use an OS for the intense focus on security and > >> > correctness, yet download the binaries from a random person on a > >> mailing > >> > list instead of any official source with reasonable file integrity > >> > checking process in place? > >> > > >> > Seems odd that people would use OpenBSD because they trust the code, > >> yet > >> > download the binaries from random torrents on the internet. > >> > >> man 1 cksum > >> ftp://ftp5.usa.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.1/i386/CKSUM > > Seems odd that people would use OpenBSD because they trust the code, yet > > use a CRC32 to verify the integrity of said operating system. > > Speaking of this, when will the OpenBSD project begin to post SHA256 > hashes > > to the ftp sites. MD5 is dead: these two files are different and yet > > have the same > > MD5 hash. > > http://www.cits.rub.de/imperia/md/content/magnus/letter_of_rec.ps > > http://www.cits.rub.de/imperia/md/content/magnus/order.ps
