On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Marco Peereboom wrote: > pseudo devices can not be disabled in UKC. Maja has a diff for that. > I'll try to have a look at that soonish so that it can be disabled. If > one wants to run raidframe one should disable softraid. I have not > tested it but would expect them to step on each other.
Just for the record... Even without my diff you can disable a pseudo device by modifing the count for the device to zero (it even might work with a negative number, i havn't tested). pseudo devices is only attached if count is greater than zero. but working disable/enable commands for pseudo devices is nicer... -moj > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:48:22PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2007/06/11 13:00, Josh Grosse wrote: > > > Running i386-current with a 26-May build everything is fine. I just built > > > a new kernel today, and got: > > > > softraid<tm*> is in GENERIC now and it autoconfigures; it may be causing > > a conflict with raidframe since they both use partitions with type raid. > > > > If you want to try disabling it, it's in the MI kernel config, > > /sys/conf/GENERIC. > > > > (if it's raid1 you want, the other option is to rebuild the box with > > softraid instead, if you do this and move files with dump/restore, > > update to the very recent sbin/dump/traverse.c first to keep ctime/mtime > > intact). > > > > > > > > <*> well, it wass, but the owners didn't renew it, so that's ok.