On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:22:47PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote: > > > I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install. > > > > Did you ever have to debug a deep directory structure where something > > caused all directory to become files? On a 500G disk? Fun. > > > > I would suggest that the OP be very specific with what is needed. What > size of filesystem? Which operating systems need to read only and which > to read and write. Given how flexible Linux and OBSD are, I would guess > that the limit will be what can windows do. I don't know since I only > used windows 3.1 for some games when I wasn't running OS/2. For 7 years > its been Debian and now I'm transitioning to OBSD. I never have to > interoperate with windows users.
OK, let's eliminate Windows from the requiremant. Now we have OpenBSD, Linux, and FreeBSD in order of importance. All 3 need read/write access. I will be using this to move data, and I want to be able to keep various places in sync, using rsync. So modification date, and file name retention are important. Where does that lead us? -- I'm sorry, no one here has any intentions of helping you with anything. I am the manager of all of Customer Service."
