Le mardi 04 septembre 2007 C 00:23 +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD a C)crit : > Salut, > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Eric Elena wrote: > > I think fat32 is a good choice: you have nothing to install. > > Did you ever have to debug a deep directory structure where something > caused all directory to become files? On a 500G disk? Fun. > > Tonnerre
No I didn't. Is it so fun? :) I didn't say fat32 is a good FS but IMHO it's a FS with less constraints than other ones. Imagine your network is down or you don't remember the name of the driver and you need to access to the data stored on a FFS disk from a new win box. I would say it's also fun :) To avoid this problem, you can create a small fat partition, store all the drivers (ext, ufs, ...) on it, and create multiple ufs/ext/.. partitions to prevent huge data loss. But it depends on the use you will have of your disk.
