On Wednesday 24 October 2007 17:25:25 Artur Grabowski wrote: > Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So I'm going to guess the answer is "No, integrating xen > > > paravirtualization is not a project priority at this time. Also, where > > > are your diffs?" > > > > The OpenBSD/Xen source is at http://hg.recoil.org/openbsd-xen-sys.hg > > Unfortunately, Anil has troubles with the availability of the server. > > > > I rely on having a willing OpenBSD developer who commits the patches I > > send to him. But as long as there is none, it doesn't go in. > > I'm willing to stretch as far as saying: This might be interesting for > some testing purposes for kernel hackers if Xen could be hosted on > OpenBSD. > > But this doesn't mean that I'm even close to volunteering doing the > job. It just would be cool to have if it doesn't break stuff. > > //art
Actually it is good to find NULL-pointer (mostly use-after-free) bugs, that are hard to find on real hardware. Believe me or not: OpenBSD has tons of them. Christoph
