On 10/25/07, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:45:23PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote: > > At 02:28 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote: > > >Sure you do. You claim that the following statement is wrong, but you > > >don't offer any explanation. That's crap. > > > > > >"There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having it > > >*more secure* than not having it at all."
> Explain how the previous statement is incorrect, as you claim. I explained it here [1] in a previous post, which demonstrates a method for detecting rootkits that would be otherwise undetectable without virtualization. > Jason Dixon [1] http://cse.ucdavis.edu/~bill/virt/virt.pdf Adam -- "Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability in the opponent." -- Sun Tzu