On 2007/11/20 3:49 PM, "Stuart Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered eloquently:
> On 2007/11/20 14:46, Preston Norvell wrote: >> kern.maxfiles=32768 > > 32k seems excessive .. > It may be. As I said I pulled it from a balancer config for *BSD for a commercial balancer. As we continue testing I will likely back it down to see what effect it has and as I try to determine what causes the remaining failed connections (we're up to 318 out of 288199 now). It will also be interesting when we bump up the number different relays the load balancer is handling. >>> On 2007/11/19 2:20 AM, "Reyk Floeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered >>> eloquently: >>> >>>> net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen > > did you look at this? > > if you see >0 in net.inet.ip.ifq.drops, you quite likely need > to bump it. > Yeah. It has been sitting at zero since we started this phase of testing, without any reboots so I took it to mean things were probably ok there. ;P mn -- Preston M Norvell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Systems/Network Administrator Serials Solutions <http://www.serialssolutions.com> Phone: (866) SERIALS (737-4257) ext 1094
