* Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 21:57]:
>  Henning Brauer wrote:
> 
>     Thanks David for this pointer. It may very well be the same issue.
>     Even though the two bridged interfaces are em(4) (1 Gb/s), the
>     Out-of-Band Management (OOBM) interface is fxp(4) that carries two
>     VLANs, one for pfsync(4), and one for command&control/monitoring.
> 
>   the leak had nothing to do with fxp.
>   it's simply a generic memory leak in a state insertion error path that 
>   single firewalls tend to trigger seldom if at all, but pfsync 
>   regularily hits.
> 
>     Still, I will given Henning's patch a try, while waiting for results
>     of the instrumentation with 'vmstat -m', as suggested by the previous
>     responder.
> 
>   if you're running pfsync i make bets it is that.
>   if you look at vmstat -m and pfstatekeypl has more objects in use than
>   pfstatepl you know it is that.
> 
> Yeah your patch thankfully does fix the problem. Just had another pair of
> 4.2 boxes
> fall over from the same bug this morning.
> 
> Is it serious enough to put an errata  note up?

assuming no ill effects from the fix show up, yes, soon.

-- 
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

Reply via email to