Thank You all for the pointers I now have it up and running and only have a small persistent route problem.
Bret Stuart Henderson wrote: >On 2007/12/11 08:40, Bret wrote: > > >>OK here is the update: >> >> > > > >>ral0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> ieee80211: nwid tri-statebroadband.com_2 chan 3 bssid >> inet 10.60.128.2 netmask 0xffffc000 broadcast 10.60.191.255 >>ral1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> ieee80211: nwid tri-statebroadband.com_2_1 chan 1 bssid >> inet 10.60.129.1 netmask 0xffffc000 broadcast 10.60.191.255 >>em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex,rxpause,txpause) >> inet 10.60.130.1 netmask 0xffffc000 broadcast 10.60.191.255 >> >> > >As I suspected, these are all in the same network. > >$ ipcalc 10.60.130.1/0xffffc000 >address : 10.60.130.1 >netmask : 255.255.192.0 (0xffffc000) >network : 10.60.128.0 /18 >broadcast : 10.60.191.255 >host min : 10.60.128.1 >host max : 10.60.191.254 >hosts/net : 16382 > >Your chosen netmask makes the first 18 bits of the IP address be >the network address, so 10.60.128 [...] 10.60.191 are all in the >same network. This part of the address should be different between >interfaces.
