On Dec 14, 2007 9:23 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Securing the RSM seal of approval may or may not appeal to you.
OpenBSD does not, pardon the french, give a shit about RMS' "seal of approval". > But that still begs the question of OpenBSD's stance on non-free > software. As opposed to RMS and FSF, OpenBSD is not on a crusade against non-free software and it's not a goal of the project to abolish such software. > Criticizing others is easy. It sure seems to be so for RMS... > Establish what your principles and policies are or are going to be. OpenBSD's policies were established a long time ago. > If you are unwilling to adopt policies consistent with his, > accept that you are not getting his endorsement and shut this thread > down. OpenBSD does not seek his endorsement. That doesn't mean individuals involved with OpenBSD can't be critical of him and his criteria. > This whole RSM is a hypocritical asshole because he will not make an > exception for OpenBSD > thread is absurd. OpenBSD does not want him to make an exception. > Richard has offered you the oportunity to aquire his endorsement. Are we supposed to feel special? > If that does not matter then shut this thread down, because it is > pointless. It was pointless from the start. --- Lars Hansson
