> David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
> > Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >   
> >> Hell, the OpenBSD ports tree should perhaps contain patches which
> >> REMOVE such commercial operating system support.  That's a fork
> >> Richard would surely approve of.
> >>
> >> Richard, your pants are full of hypocritical poo.
> >>   
> >>     
> >     I have no doubt that in some context Richard is hypocritical.
> > Though most of us would be hard pressed to structure our lives
> > to be consistent with our beleifs and principles to the extent
> > that he has.
> >
> >     But this is not about EMACS, nor is it about  hypocracy.
> >    
> >     It is about OpenBSD.
> 
> You were right up until this point.
> 
> I highly doubt that many OpenBSD developers or users care whether or not 
> RMS endorses OpenBSD. I know I don't.
> 
> RMS has made statements which detract against OpenBSD and contradict the 
> actions of his own organization, the FSF. They do not even take his 
> fundamentalist stance with some of their own software, as pointed out by 
> Theo.
> 
> Calling him on his hypocrisy is this project's most reasonable defense 
> against his statements. Anything else would require more effort from 
> OpenBSD than it took RMS to muck about in the first place. And it's not 
> worth any additional effort.
> 
> RMS has not thrown the gauntlet at OpenBSD, he has thrown mud. We are 
> throwing it back because we don't feel OpenBSD deserves it.
> 
> There will never be an opportunity for cooperation between OpenBSD and 
> the FSF because the FSF has an agenda which is at odds with OpenBSD. The 
> project is trying to remove the GPL where ever possible, and I think 
> that is part of what motivated RMS to make his negative statements about 
> the OpenBSD project.
> 
> To me, the tone of your email indicates that you think we should stand 
> here and listen to his crap, and then try to build a relationship from 
> it. He didn't come here to build anything. He came here wagging his 
> tongue like a loon and those of us that support OpenBSD are now exposing 
> him for what he is.
> 
> He brought this on himself and he deserves it. Shame on him and shame on 
> those who try to make excuses for him.
> 
> Breeno
> 

Be sure to cc Richard so that he knows.

Reply via email to