Didi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do you guys think of this?
There's not enough data to say much one way or the other, really. Those hashes do not provide sufficient data to recreate the files they were made from, they're only checksums of a kind that's hard to fake. Then again, a general-purpose response might be called for, so as a public service I did the following [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dd if=/dev/arandom count=512000 of=ode_to_trolls.wav 2>/dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ oggenc -r ode_to_trolls.wav [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lame -b 192 ode_to_trolls.wav ode_to_trolls.mp3 The result, including the MD5 sums, is available for free distribution to use as appropriate from http://home.nuug.no/~peter/ode_to_trolls/, MD5 (ode_to_trolls.mp3) = 208a5673bb6642b16d7bf05e4581c39b MD5 (ode_to_trolls.ogg) = 7b00779823515c8661a99322059e1673 MD5 (ode_to_trolls.wav) = 797bb20ad338ad5c8807ab50955bb27d file sizes left as an excercise to the reader. And yes, grab then while they're fresh. They may not stay around too long. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
