IPSEC works well if you blissfully ignore the hassle of setting up IPSEC on every possible client you want to support in your network. OS X' native configuration panels does not deal with IPSEC, but, comes with Racoon so that one can take the trouble to set it up without having to compile additional software. Windows doesn't not deal with IPSEC easily either, and once one has taken the painstaking hassle to set it up they quickly find that the crypto supported isn't much to cheer over.
I'm personally also waiting for the day WPA/2 capability finally shows up in OpenBSD, but, in the meanwhile, sure, unencrypted or WEP'd WiFi with IPSEC *works* - just not easily :) The best tip I can give to you, Dominik, is to go with OpenVPN for now. It's a much more convenient solution, especially since competent and intuitive client tools are freely available under both Windows, OS X, and BSD/Linux. -SD On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Luis Guillermo Coronado Chacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dominik, the short answer is: no, no WPA in OpenBSD. The long answer > lies on many, many, many posts on this list. (http://marc.info for more > details), but for a preview of all that: is not going to happen anytime > soon because no one actually provides code for it and so far not a > single developer wants/need it on the kernel. The reasons for this are > very well explained. > > Just asking for features is not the right way to approach this community > unless they come with some code attached :-d > > Believe me WEP+IPSEC (or WEP+ssh for that matter) works very well. > > Luis
