Lars NoodC)n schrieb:
> It seems that OpenBSD's Stop the Blob message is getting more recognition:
>
>       http://www.fsdaily.com/stop-blob
>
> As the article points out, better late than never.
>
> Though OpenBSD had been on my list of things to look at for years, it
> was the Stop-the-Blob campaign that provided for me the final nudge.
>
> Regards
> -Lars
>
>   
Sorrym but your are misguided. GNU and the Linux kernel hackers have
protested often over all the years. One thing that has holded them back
is that firstly Linus does not seem to care very much about the GNU
principles (but he cared so much to chose GNU license) - another thing
seems to be that many Linux kernel hackers work for companies that
understand their mission as to provide the customers with what they
want. And also, as you all know, open documentation has gone a long way
till today. For long years on many hardware parts free software was not
available.

Richard Stallman protested openly in 2006 more visible than OpenBSD did:
http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/rms-ati-protest.html

You are right that OpenBSD and Theo did make reoccuring demands over
many years and one could truely say that OpenBSD has always been more
determined and clear. If Linus would have been an advocate for free
software I am sure things would have been gone in a different direction.

Personally I believe all free operating systems have worked on the
change of the situation. The popularity of Linux has helped to create a
market that has better and more open documentation - and machines that
are made to work perfect with Linux (like eeepc) are more easily made to
work perfectly for OpenBSD and other free OSes.

There are different paths that are walked, but I remember there have
been a lot of quarrels with hardware vendors from the Linux kernel
hackers and often some hackers tried to establish a more strict policy.
My guess is that more Linux hackers today think that they have enough
drivers to push things forward and to use the power to indeed force
hardware vendors to comply. In the past users were more used to beg for
support and documentation and everything that was given - and if it only
where NVIDIA binary drivers where applauded as a great gift. But now
times are changing - maybe some hackers always thought like that but did
not believe in a possible success - but now they do. Linus could help
greatly if he would speak out in the same sense. I doubt he will,
because he is thinking more about practical aspects, which means he
seems to see a free license of the kernel as very important but also
thinks that if things work somehow, that is good enough and that forcing
the vendors might backlash somehow.

Regards,
Thilo


-- 
Thilo Pfennig - PfennigSolutions IT-Beratung- Wiki-Systeme
Sandkrug 28 - 24143 Kiel (Germany)
http://www.pfennigsolutions.de/
XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Thilo_Pfennig -
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/tpfennig

Reply via email to