Wow, I appreciate your insights. Yudhvir ===
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jason Dixon <ja...@dixongroup.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:52:03PM +0200, I?igo Ortiz de Urbina wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> > wrote: > > > On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina <tarom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Mehma, > > >> > > >> You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers > > >> achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its > > >> really interesting IMHO: > > >> > > >> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2007/11/01/whats-new-in-bsd-42.html > > >> > > >> Hope it helps you feel the need of trying pf _at home_ :) > > > > > > That is a good start, but there have been other changes since. > > > Not only pf, but also pfsync, nic drivers, and more. > > > > > > -current has some nice extras (added after 4.5) for ruleset sanity > > > too. For example, "match" rules, which are absolutely great when > > > combined with tags. > > > > Indeed, and the active-active setup. > > > > For those interested, here's more info on the subject: > > > > Lecture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBxDgevQpCg > > Paper, part1 : http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20090220014805 > > This will get you all of the related stories: > > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=search&mode=&thres=&method=and&sort=revtime&query=redesign+pfsync > > > -- > Jason Dixon > DixonGroup Consulting > http://www.dixongroup.net/
