On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:54:37PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:33 PM, stan<st...@panix.com> wrote: > > We are in the process of upgrading a number of machines from 4.2 to 4.5. > > > > upgrades are supported fromrelease to release so > 4.2 > 4.3 > 4.4 > 4.5
OK, so I am sloppy with my wording. This is not actually an upgrade, but we are instead building replacement machines, and moving over the config files. So it's not an _upgrade_ as such issue, but a diffrenece in observed behavior between 4.2, and 4.5. -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.
