On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:31:43PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:12:27PM -0400, stan wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:54:37PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:33 PM, stan<st...@panix.com> wrote:
> > > > We are in the process of upgrading a number of machines from 4.2 to 4.5.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > upgrades are supported fromrelease to release so
> > > 4.2 > 4.3 > 4.4 > 4.5
> > 
> > OK, so I am sloppy with my wording. This is not actually an upgrade, but we
> > are instead building replacement machines, and moving over the config
> > files. So it's not an _upgrade_ as such issue, but a diffrenece in observed
> > behavior between 4.2, and 4.5.
> 
> The 4.5 rwhod doesn't even send anything on the network, that makes
> it very hard for other daemon to gather your info. Claudio seem to
> have made a fix for 4.6. I don't run a rwhod on a regular basis but
> the one I compiled from the 4.6 source does send reports on the
> network.
> 
> If you have the source tree.
> 
> cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/rwhod
> cvs up -rOPENBSD_4_6 -PAd
> make obj && make clean && make depend && make && make install
> 
> (You might want to test /usr/src/usr.sbin/rwhod/obj/rwhod before
> the "make install" just to see if it resolve your issue.)

Thanks for the help on this.

-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.

Reply via email to