> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Daniel Ouellet" <[email protected]>
> Gesendet: 15.09.09 16:20:09
> An: misc <[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: Defending OpenBSD Performance


> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Nick <[email protected]> [2009-09-15 13:52]:
> >> Yep.  Most performance-oriented thing I've done with OpenBSD was
> >> firewalling a 45Mbps T3 line.  It did tax the machine a little bit,
> >> but the primary firewall was a Celeron 600, about five years old at
> >> the time it was put into service (failover was a PIII-750, which
> >> showed a lot lower load, I think it was more the cache than the MHz).
> >
> > i have a bgp machine forwarding 800MBit/s of real world generic
> > internet traffic. can handle at least twice that. enough of a
> > benchmark?
>
> Henning,
>
> If I may ask here. One thing that would be nice for the records is to
> get a little bit more details on your setup doing that if you have no
> problem providing it obviously. Specially the PF configuration tie to
> this bgp router as well may well be very educating to many.
>
> I always wonder what simple difference from stock install might be there
> in the hardware or sysctl to get there, what network card are use now,
> but more important is the PF configuration use in some router as well. I
> really do not recall have seen one email on the subject. That would be
> great to have. Not something to preach by, but something useful and base
> line if you want to start with.
>
> I for one would welcome it and would be curious as to what PF
> configuration tie with the bgp router are actually in use and proven to
> be good with decent speed. Obviously I assume there is a minimum of PF
> in use there, but may be not? Am I wrong?
>
> I don't know if many would appreciate this for the records, but I sure
> would love it. Should you find a little time to put it on misc@ know you
> would have an avid reader for it! (;>

+1

Reply via email to