On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:01:02PM -0700, 4625 wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:01:49 +0000 Jacob Meuser wrote: > > > > > But, I'd like to have hard technicaly data to demonstrate that > > > > while Linux and FreeBSD may scale to a gazillion CPUs and > > > > PetaBytes of Memory that OpenBSD makes a fine firewall or desktop > > > > or mail server, etc and point out that the old article so many > > > > people cite is indeed *old*. > > > > > > Firewall and mail server - may be. But desktop would not be so fine. > > > > > 3) Also try to find thread with subject '/usr/ports/audio/timidity' > > > in po...@openbsd.*** archive. > > > > I think your problem can be traced to the different default voices. > I've test timidity with a different sound fonts and with the same > config, like I have one in FreeBSD, on the same PC.
this is the frst time you ever said anything about what patches you're using, which is why I never took your report seriously. I wonder if FreeBSD's patch-playmidi would make any difference. busted reverb could sound like missed samples. > > > > btw, FreeBSD doesn't support multichannel audio. > Don't know do I really need multichannel. maybe you don't. but for me, multichannel audio is more important for a desktop than some busted old software midi player. > But I'm sure, I should boot > FreeBSD-4.11 to listen midi files. or you could use a less ancient midi player. -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
