On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:59:35PM +0100, Cian Brennan wrote: > You have an odd definition of professional, and the kind of attitude that > sounds like you haven't actually worked in the computer industry in a while. > Generally, the computer industry is about providing services to end users. And > things like easy updates, specialisation of labour and all of that kind of > stuff have made us an awful lot better at taht than 'old school UNIX' ever was.
Yes, buying shit loads of crappy solutions from any vendor without even understanding the basic concepts is not being retarded. Hey it works ! and they pay me ! Fuck that. > > But hey, if you want to pretend we all still live in the early 90s, feel free. > I hope it works out well for you. If you had done your homework you would know that the early 90s is UNIX dark age. UNIX was never intentend to reach everyone, we despised intel and PC in the 80s mainly cause the architecture is plain lame, so stop whining and trying to change a 40 years old culture, or move to the so called "The New Hackers Culture", "The New Hackers Bullshit" if I may. Providing service to users ? what kind of world do you live, just because we expect the user to know better than the designer ? We provide mechanism not policy, policy dies, mechanism stays. Who the fuck uses a computer if not users ? Your definition of service is utterly flawed, in order to use the service UNIX provides you're required not to be stupid. > > OpenBSD's a wonderful OS, but it's lack of easy upgradability is a > *disadvantage, not something to be proud of. And yes, there are good > reasons why it doesn't exist, the linuxes do have massively more > man power, and developers time *is* probably better spent on new features, > rather than on packaging. Acting smug about your failings just makes you look > like silly, however. Blah blah blah... -- Christiano Farina HAESBAERT Do NOT send me html mail.
