hmm, on Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:26:48PM -0400, Ted Unangst said that > 2009/9/22 Sergio Andris Gsmez del Real <sergio.g.delr...@gmail.com>: > > maybe a little reference would be great, cause very little or non > literature > > is found about OpenBSD implementation... (or maybe I'm struggling > > searching). I just wanna say I'm loving the system (and the phylosophy). > > The OpenBSD implementation of procfs was written/donated to BSD 15 > years ago, back when it was still at Berkeley. In OpenBSD, it has > barely changed since, and isn't really maintained or supported, so > there's not much else to say about it.
not to "stir shit" as Nic calls it, but openbsd was always swift to remove unused bit rotting stuff. what's the deal with procfs? if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden, why is it left to rot? -f -- our world: a 8000 mile in diameter spherical pile of dirt.
