On 2009-10-04, Peter N. M. Hansteen <pe...@bsdly.net> wrote:
> I suppose everybody here knows what greytrapping is and why no spamd
> setup is really complete without at least Bob Beck's uatraps in its
> config. But then some of do our own local greytrapping, and I for one
> have been exporting the contents of my local-greytrap once per hour to
> a publicly accessible location for the benefit of anybody who wants to
> use the information.
>
> I assume there are others out there who do their own greytrapping, and
> it might be a good thing for all of us if the data generated at those
> various locations was made available to others. The data would likely
> overlap quite a bit with established sources such as uatraps and
> nixspam, but more likely than not we would be catching a few that
> would otherwise slip through the cracks.
>
> So I'm considering setting up a consolidated greytrap list to
> supplement uatraps and others, if other greytrappers out there are
> willing to share their data.
>
> My list is available at [1], with a the list of trap addresses and
> some description at [2], with a policy statement of sorts at [3] (I
> imagine I would require a similar statement from any participants),
> and various field notes available at my blog (see the signature).
>
> Would something like this be useful? Any comments and feedback
> (including why this would be a monumentally stupid idea) welcome.
I definetely welcome this, I added your blacklist to my spamd.conf and
I'll see how it works out. I don't do greytrapping yet but I may
consider it in the future.
Best regards,
Jona
--
Worse is better
Richard P. Gabriel
